An expert consensus, formed through iterative Delphi processes with 25 international experts, strengthens methodological rigor and practical application in e-mental health, facilitating global access to mental health care.

The article “How to e-Mental Health” offers comprehensive guidelines for researchers and practitioners on effectively utilizing digital technology in the field of mental health. It aims to promote methodological rigor, evidence-based practices, and the long-term implementation of technological innovations in mental healthcare.

Key Points:

• Background: The article addresses the lack of methodological guidelines in the rapidly expanding field of e-mental health. It highlights the importance of establishing clear methodologies for research and practical applications in this area.
• Methodology: The authors used an iterative Delphi process involving 25 international experts and a think tank in the e-mental health field. This approach ensured a broad and diverse range of perspectives and expertise.

The article covers three primary objectives:

• Development: Guidelines for creating e-mental health interventions.
• Study Specifics: Recommendations for conducting research on e-mental health.
• Intervention Evaluation: Guidelines for assessing the effectiveness of e-mental health interventions.
• Topics Addressed: The expert consensus provided insights into 11 critical topics within e-mental health, covering aspects such as user-friendly development, ethical considerations, data privacy, user engagement, cultural sensitivity, and long-term sustainability.

Methodology:

1. An iterative Delphi process was employed, involving 25 international experts in e-mental health and a think tank specializing in this field.
2. This process allowed for a systematic and thorough examination of the current state of e-mental health research and practice.
3. The panel of experts reviewed and discussed the various aspects of e-mental health, providing insights and recommendations.
4. Through multiple rounds of review and feedback, a consensus was reached on key guidelines and practical recommendations.

Findings:

1. Methodological Quality: The expert consensus significantly contributes to enhancing the methodological quality of e-mental health research and practice.
2. Evidence-Based Practices: The guidelines provide practical recommendations based on scientific knowledge, ensuring that e-mental health interventions are evidence-based.
3. Long-Term Implementation: The article emphasizes the importance of sustainable, long-term implementation of e-mental health solutions in the healthcare system.
4. Global Access: These guidelines aim to maximize the promise of e-mental health technology by promoting low-threshold access to mental health treatment worldwide.

References:

1. Source: Seiferth C, Vogel L, Aas B, Brandhorst I, Carlbring P, Conzelmann A, Esfandiari N, Finkbeiner M, Hollmann K, Lautenbacher H, Meinzinger E. How to e-mental health: a guideline for researchers and practitioners using digital technology in the context of mental health. Nature mental health. 2023 Aug;1(8):542-54.
2. Springer Nature Limited