Airborne transmission through droplet nuclei has rightfully been referred to as the “elusive pathway” of infection. With the exception of tuberculosis, airborne transmission changed into historically regarded as an unusual and ephemeral phenomenon for lots of bacterial and viral respiratory pathogens. It stays controversial, too, with broadly differing conclusions approximately its significance being drawn from the identical research. The proof to help both sides of the airborne debate has been thin at the ground in comparison with the relative wealth of knowledge on hand hygiene and large-droplet precautions. This reflects the issue in sampling and growing microorganisms from the air, due to the fact they’re found in very low concentrations in comparison with nonbiological particles, and it requires specialized equipment and a nuanced approach. For example, possible airborne Pseudomonas aeruginosa was determined in cough aerosols from patients with cystic fibrosis, with the levels associated with the infectious burden. Such probably infectious cough aerosols continue to be possible as much as four m away and for as much as 45 minutes. However, it’s miles hard to place those results in a significant context, because the infectious inoculum is unknown. This is a recurring theme in lots of research of airborne transmission.

The viral load of aerosols is a key aspect in figuring out the relative contribution of airborne transmission. However, sampling and detecting airborne viruses is tough due to their low concentrations in air and susceptibility to destruction and inactivation at some stages in sampling. Air samples are frequently analyzed for the presence of viral genomes by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) or quantitative opposite transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) methods, that are exceedingly sensitive. Nevertheless, the presence of genetic fabric by myself does now no longer indicates whether or not the virus is infectious. The viability of viruses relies upon the integrity and feature in their genomic material, nucleoprotein, capsid, and/or envelope. Although a few research have attempted and didn’t subculture viruses from the air, the usage of extra mild methods, which includes a liquid condensation collection device, has enabled the detection of numerous possible viral respiratory pathogens, along with influenza viruses and SARS-CoV-2 in aerosols

Photo by CDC from Pexels